Inference- Human Rights violation.
I. The “obligation to protect” requires States to protect individuals against abuses by non-State actors, foreign State agents, or State agents acting outside of their official capacity. The obligation entails both a preventative and remedial dimension. A State is thus obliged to enact legislation protecting human rights, and to take action to protect individuals when it is aware of threats to their human rights.
II. The reality however is hard- hitting. The question arises as to the implementation of this gigantic task. Poverty breeds poverty. The vicious circle of poverty denies to lakhs of children the right to education, despite the fundamental right that children below 14 years of age shall be given access to primary education.
III. Australia took its place on the UN Human Rights Council this year for a three-year term. Australia delivered a strong statement about Myanmar's atrocities against ethnic Rohingya Muslims, but was criticised for holding refugees and asylum seekers offshore. While Australia supported important country resolutions, it failed to take a leadership role on any key issues.
I talks about protecting Human Rights, whereas, II and III talks about instances where Human Rights violation took place. So, Option 2 is correct.
A, B and C joined into a partnership with investment in the ratio of 6 : 7 : 9 respectively. Behind one year, B doubled his investment. At the end of ...
A and B entered into a business investing their capital in the ratio of 16:21, respectively and the respective ratio of time for which they made their i...
‘A’ started a business with the investment of Rs. 19000. After ‘x’ months and after 6 months from starting ‘B’ and ‘C’, respectively, jo...
Aman, Bhanu, and Chinky commenced a business with initial investments in the ratio 5:7:8, respectively. After one year, they made additional investments...
Three persons Arvind, Bittu and Chinmey entered into a partnership with initial capitals of Rs.5000, Rs.7000, Rs.9000 respectively for 6 months, 5 month...
The savings of Arun and Bhaskar are same. The difference between the expenditure of Bhaskar and the savings of both Arun and Bhaskar together is 0. The ...
Anil and Sunil together start a business with investment of Rs. 1500 and Rs. ‘x + 1300’, respectively. If the profit earned after 5 years is...
‘A’ and ‘B’ entered into a partnership by investing Rs. 9900 and Rs. 5500, respectively. If ‘A’ invested his sum for...
A invested Rs X in a scheme. After 6 months, B joined with Rs 3000 more than that of A. After an year, ratio of profit of B to the total profit was 5: 9...
A and B enter into a partnership with their initial sum of Rs.28000 and Rs.40000 respectively. After 8 months, a third person C also joins them with his...