Get Started with ixamBee
Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Explanation: (a) had met: This is the past perfect tense, which is not necessary in this context. Past perfect is used to indicate an action completed before another past action, but it's not required here. (b) meet: This is the base form of the verb, and it does not fit the past time frame indicated by "last week." (c) have met: This is the present perfect tense, which is used to connect the past with the present. It is not the most appropriate choice for a specific past action that occurred last week. (d) met: This is the simple past tense, and it is the correct choice for describing an action that happened in the past, specifically last week in this context.
Directions: In the question below, a passage is given followed by few statements. Read the passage and answer the questions that follow.
Even w...
A statement is given, followed by two arguments I and II. You have to consider the statement and two arguments and decide which of the argument(s) is/ar...
Statement: Should it be said that the demonetisation exercise combined with the uncertainty around the July 1 adoption of the new indirect tax regime ...
Statement: Should the government revoke the GST and bring in the previous tax regime?
Argument I: Yes, the state governments are unable to recove...
Statement: Should graduation be made minimum educational qualification for entry level jobs in any public sector organisation?
Argument:
...Statement : The findings, which appear in the latest issue of the journal ‘Frontiers in Robotics and AI’, suggest that virtual interviewers could ...
Statement: Should there be a complete ban on extracurricular activities in college.
Arguments:
I. No, there is nothing wrong in...
