Question
Why according to the passage, is it essential for India
to keep its commitment on Paris Agreement? Read the passage given below and answer the questions that follow: The disclosure in Parliament that the Centre is not ready with the rules to implement the Compensatory Afforestation Fund Act, 2016 demonstrates that the government’s resolve to meet a variety of environmental objectives, including major commitments under the Paris Agreement on climate change and the Sustainable Development Goals, remains woefully weak. It is, of course, debatable whether the Act, with the disbursal mechanism through national and State funds that it mandates, is a sound remedy for loss of rich forests that continues to occur because of developmental and biotic pressures. The evidence on compensatory afforestation in a big project such as the Sardar Sarovar Dam, for instance, is not encouraging. About 13,000 hectares were compensated there, but only with patchy outcomes: healthy monoculture plantations having low biodiversity value came up in some places, while others resulted in unhealthy plantations with few trees. Be that as it may, diversion of forests for non-forest use seems inevitable to some degree, and the accumulation of about ₹40,000 crore in compensatory funds clearly points to significant annexation of important habitats. The task is to make an assessment of suitable lands, preferably contiguous with protected areas that can be turned over for management to a joint apparatus consisting of forest department staff and scientific experts. Putting in place a scientific national plan to expand good green cover is essential, since the sequestration of carbon through sustainably managed forests is a key component of the commitment made under the Paris Agreement. There is already a Green India Mission, which is distinct from the framework envisaged for compensatory afforestation. What the Centre needs to do is to enable independent audit of all connected programmes, in order to sensibly deploy the financial resources now available. It must be emphasised, however, that replacing a natural forest with a plantation does not really serve the cause of nature, wildlife, or the forest-dwelling communities who depend on it, because of the sheer loss of biodiversity. Yet, there is immense potential to augment the services of forests through a careful choice of plants and trees under the afforestation programme. All this can make a beginning only with the actualisation of the law passed in 2016. It is worth pointing out that the method used to calculate the net present value of forests, taking into account all ecosystem services they provide, is far from perfect, as many scientists point out. Some of the momentum for compensatory afforestation has come from judicial directives, but now that there is a new law in place, it should be given a foundation of rules that rest on scientific credibility.Solution
It is evident that the author of the passage emphasizes on the need to keep the commitment on Paris Agreement but the reason behind it is not specified.
Consider the following regions of India:
1. Western Ghats
2. Aravali Hills
3. Eastern Himalayas
Which of the above...
In which atmospheric layer is there no decrease in temperature with an increase in altitude?
Consider the following statements:
1. Rajmahal highlands consist of lava flow deposits.
2. Bundelkhand gneiss belong to the oldest A...
Which is the largest freshwater lake in the world?
Which region of Earth's atmosphere is the coldest?
Consider the following events in the geological history of India:
1. Formation of Gondwana coal
2. Formation of Himalayas
3....
Which term describes the sphere of Earth encompassing all life and their ecological interactions?
What does the term "Gracilaria" refer to?
Consider the following statements:
1. The Galwan Valley is located between Ladakh in the west and Aksai Chin in the east.
2. The Ladakh Pl...
Identify the Southernmost Point of India's Territory: