Question
Can we infer from this article that there is an
immediate need of an international forum to help small island nations threatened by rising sea levels? Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it. Certain words/ Phrases have been printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of the questions. Tuvalu is a small island nation in the South Pacific and home to about 10,000 people. It is likely to be under water in less than 70 years. Due to the rising sea level caused by global warming, other low-lying island nations such as Kiribati, Fiji, Marshall Islands, Vanuatu, Micronesia and Nauru are destined to suffer the same fate. The 52 low-lying vulnerable island nations sustain 62 million people and emit less than 1% of global greenhouse gases (GHGs), yet are among the first victims of climate disruption. High sea levels have already resulted in displacement of people in several small island nations. These island nations require immediate remedies, including migration, compensation and reduction in GHG emissions. More people are likely to migrate due to slow-onset processes of environmental degradation such as inundation , desertification, soil erosion and changing coastlines than sudden-onset events like storms and cyclones. The total population in the South Sea region is projected to reach in excess of 18 million by mid-century, which could result in between 665,000 and 1,750,000 people migrating to other regions of the world. A sea level rise of 0.5 to 2 m could leave between 1.2 and 2.2 million people displaced from the Caribbean Sea and the Indian and Pacific Oceans. This will set off domestic as well as cross-border migration. The international community does not yet realise its responsibility to enable such migration. For example, on request from Tuvalu’s Prime Minister, New Zealand agreed to allow a meagre 75 Tuvaluans to relocate annually to their country, a migration that should stretch over 140 years. Australia refused to make any offers when approached similarly. The cost of adaptation is bound to be exorbitant. The capital cost of sea level rise in the Caribbean Community countries alone is estimated at $187 billion by 2080. The Pacific Possible programme of the World Bank predicts the cost of adaptation to be $18,500 per person for Marshall Islands and $11,000 for Solomon Islands over a period of 30 years from 2012. Legal analysts are considering the possibility of an international compensation commission which could address the burden of adaptation expenses on the island nations through an international fund. With the policies in force today, GHG emissions are projected to grow by 50% by 2050. Any amount of decrease in GHG emissions cannot save the islands from sinking, but a significant decrease in emissions could delay the island nations from becoming uninhabitable, thereby postponing the burden of accommodating mass migration. While these are broad remedies that the sinking island nations immediately require, they are hardly exhaustive. There is a need for a wide range of varied remedies, mostly adaptive, such as coastal protection, population consolidation, rainwater harvesting and storage, alternative methods of growing fruits and vegetables, human resource development and research and observation. However, in any remedial adaptive mechanism employed, high costs are unavoidable. The only practical way to attain these remedies seems to be to reinvigorate political pressure and negotiate globally to arrive at a forum that could deal with the issue. The primary focus of the forum so created must be to ensure adequate and appropriate remedies as discussed above. The forum must enable negotiations regarding the legal status of migrants and develop adaptive strategies in the destination country to guarantee and to protect dignity and cultural identity of the displaced in the destination country.Solution
Solution: In the passage, it is stated that “While these are broad remedies that the sinking island nations immediately require, they are hardly exhaustive.” So, there is an immediate requirement. Also, the writer states that “The international community does not yet realise its responsibility to enable such migration.”
- Pipe D can fill a pool in 6 hours and pipe E in 12 hours. If both the pipes are opened in an empty pool, how much time will they take to fill it?
Pipe A and Pipe B together can fill the tank in 15 hours. The capacity of the pipe A is 30% of the capacity of the pipe B. How much time will pipe B alo...
Three pipe P1, P2 and P3 fill the tank in 15 hours, 10 hours and 20 hours respectively. If all the three pipes opened together and pipe P2 & P1 are clo...
Together, the three intake pipes, "P," "Q," and "R," can fill a water tank in eight hours. While the three pipes are opened simultaneously, pipe "Q" clo...
Pipe ‘A’ fills a tank in 16 hours. Pipe ‘B’ empties the same in 32 hours. If both are opened together, how much time will it take to fill 50% o...
A tank has two inlet pipes, A and B, which can fill the tank in 6 hours and 8 hours, respectively, and an outlet pipe C, which can empty the tank in 12 ...
Inlet pipes 'A' and 'B' can fill a tank in 24 minutes and 40 minutes, respectively. Both the pipes are opened together to fill the tank. When the tank i...
Pipe L can empty the tank which is 45% filled in 9 hours. The time taken by pipe K and J together to fill an empty tank completely in 7.5 hours. Pipe J ...
Pipe ‘A’ takes 30 hours to fill a tank. Pipe ‘B’ takes 90 hours to empty the same tank. If they are opened together, then 60% of the tank will b...
Pipe A can fill a tank in 8 hours, while pipe B can empty the full tank in 12 hours. Both pipes are opened together. After how many hours should pipe B ...
Relevant for Exams:
