Question
Direction: In the sentence given below, a part is
highlighted and suggestions for its correction are given below the sentence. Choose the correct option, which can improve the original sentence without changing its meaning. If the highlighted part is correct, select ‘No improvement required’ as your answer. A senior advocate appraised the Supreme Court that abdication of Article 370 has led to adverse consequences. A. apprised the Supreme Court that the abdication of Article 370 has led to B. appraised the Supreme Court that the abrogation of Article 370 has led to C. apprised the Supreme Court that the abrogation of Article 370 has led toSolution
In this sentence, the word "appraised" is not used correctly. The correct term should be "apprised," which means to inform or notify. Additionally, the term "abdication" is not the appropriate word to describe the revocation of Article 370. The correct term is "abrogation," which means to repeal or annul.
As per Section 5 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act regarding the extent of judicial intervention in matters governed by Part I, which of the follo...
According to Prof. Dicey, what are the three meanings or principles of the Rule of Law?
a. Supremacy of Law
b. Equality b...
Right to property is a:
In case of a transfer of dwelling house by one of the co-owners______.
According to Clause 1 of Article 25 of the Indian Constitution, the freedom of religion is subject to the interest of:
What does the word “legal injury” mean?
Which provision of Consumer protection act 2019 talks about rights of consumers?
As per the IBC, 2016 a Financial Creditor means______________
Which of the following sections of Limitation Act deals with effect of substituting or adding new plaintiff or defendant?
Who are the persons by whom a promise is to be performed as per the Contract Act?
