Question
This question consists of a sentence which is divided into
four parts numbered (1) to (4). Only one part of the sentence is not acceptable in standard written English. Identify that part which contains an error.Solution
This sentence is an example of a third conditional structure, which refers to hypothetical past events and their consequences. The correct form should be "she would not have" instead of "she will not have" because:The past perfect ("Had she been more cautious") correctly sets up the condition.The result clause should use "would have + past participle" to indicate what could have happened if the condition had been met.Corrected Sentence:"Had she been more cautious, she would not have fallen victim to such a well-planned fraud."
Panama wilt disease marked with  wilting and a light yellow colouring of the lower leaves, most prominent around the margins, is a disease of ____
What is the optimum relative humidity range for crop production?
Which of the following material is prohibited in organic farming?
Which is the alternate host of stem rust of wheat?
Yield of dry matter is a function of:
The Indian institute of sugarcane research is located at______.
Quantity of seed required for sowing direct-seeded rice in a 10,000 square metre area at a spacing of 20 cm × 5 cm. if 1000 grain weight is 20 g and g...
Heifer is a term given to………..
What is the purpose of mulesing in sheep farming?
Jackfruit is propagated through