Question
Consider the following statements: 1. The
salary allowance of a high court judge is decided by parliament. 2. The salary of a high court judge is charged on a consolidated fund of India. 3. The Constitution does not contain detailed provisions regarding jurisdiction of the high court. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?Solution
• Statement 1 is correct: The salary of High court judges is charged Expenditure which is decided by parliament of the country. • Statement 2 is incorrect: The salary of a high court judge is charged on a consolidated fund of States. • Statement 3 is correct: The given statement is true. Nothing substantial regarding jurisdiction of the high court is provided in the Constitution Â
(39.933% of 30.03) - (27.78 `xx` 15.30) = ? - (40 `xx` 38.87)
(1680.23 ÷ 27.98) + (600.32 ÷ 23.9) + 1384.11 = ?
14.742 ÷ 24.98 × 15.76 = ?% of 359.88
(79.79% of 800.24 - √224.75) × (2/5 of 499.71) ÷ (10% of 600.26) = ?
20.22% of (61.9 × 5.01) + 69.97 =?Â
Find the approximate value of Question mark(?) for given equation.Â
104.85% of 479.89 – √2400.91 + (71.92 ÷ 6.03) × 24.85 = ?
...Find the approximate value of Question mark(?). No need to find the exact value.
(639.78 ÷ 15.96) × 5 + 30.14% of 349.88 – √(224.95) ÷ 5...
15.98% of 399.76 × 2.98 = ?% of 599.93Â
- What approximate value will come in place of the question mark (?) in the following question? (Note: You are not expected to calculate the exact value.)
Relevant for Exams:
