Continue with your mobile number
● Statement 1 and 4 are correct: The law was supposed to and has certainly been able to curb the evil of defection to a great extent. It has reduced corruption as well as nondevelopmental expenditure incurred on a regular election. Political instability caused by frequent and unholy change of allegiance on the part of the legislators of our country has been contained to a very great extent. Moreover, it gives, for the first time, a clear-cut constitutional recognition to the existence of political parties. ● Statement 2 is incorrect: Despite the positives, a very alarming trend of legislators defecting in groups to another party in search of greener pastures is visible. The recent examples of defection in state Assemblies (Goa, Karnataka etc.) and even in Rajya Sabha bear this out. This only shows that the law needs a relook in order to plug the loopholes it obviously has. ● Statement 3 is incorrect: The anti-defection law does not make a differentiation between dissent and defection. It curbs the legislator’s right to dissent and freedom of conscience. It clearly puts party bossism on a pedestal and sanctions tyranny of the party in the name of the party discipline.
How important is it for you to have close relationships with others?
How important is it for you to feel a sense of purpose or meaning in your life?
How do you approach teamwork or collaboration?
How do you typically respond to failure or setbacks?
How do you react when you feel overwhelmed?
How do you typically handle conflicts or disagreements with others?
How do you typically approach problem-solving?
How can you strike a balance between your ambition for accomplishment and success and your need for work-life balance?
How do you handle situations where you are required to prioritize multiple tasks or responsibilities?
How likely are you to take risks in life, even if they may have negative consequences?