This situation is a classic example of phishing, where attackers impersonate someone trustworthy to steal sensitive information or finances. The best practice is to report the email to the IT security team without engaging with the sender. By doing so: 1. The organization’s security team can investigate and mitigate further risks. 2. The employee avoids unintentionally providing information or falling into the trap. 3. Reporting helps educate others in the organization about the phishing attempt. Replying to the email or calling the number provided could expose more information or lead to further attacks, making non-engagement critical. Why Other Options Are Incorrect: • A) Replying: Engaging with the sender can reveal personal or organizational information. • B) Transferring funds: Taking action without verification risks financial loss. • D) Calling the number in the email: The number might lead to the attacker directly. • E) Forwarding the email: Sharing it risks spreading malware if attachments or links are clicked.
According to Sale of Goods Act, 1930 “goods”
What actions related to fictitious stamps are punishable under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita?
People who are not liable under the Indian Penal Code when working in their official capacities?
The case of Kailash Sharma vs. The Patna Municipal Corporation and Ors.______?
In case of a lease having yearly rent,:
According to Indian Partnership Act, 1932 Within how many months of attaining majority or obtaining knowledge of admission to partnership benefits must...
Part Performance of a contract of transfer is mentioned under Section ……… of Transfer of Property Act
The Supreme Court in the landmark case of Lalita Kumari v. State of UP held that
Which section of SARFAESI Act deals with measures of Asset Reconstruction?
The Commissioner of Food Safety for the State under Food Safety and Standards Act is appointed by