Question
Which of the following scenarios violates Boyce-Codd
Normal Form (BCNF) in a relational schema?Solution
BCNF is a stricter version of 3NF. A table is in BCNF if, for every functional dependency X→YX , X is a superkey. If a candidate key determines another candidate key, it creates redundancy and violates BCNF. For instance, consider a table where StudentID and CourseID are candidate keys, but CourseID determines StudentID. This means there are multiple possible combinations leading to redundancy. Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
- Option A: This scenario adheres to both 3NF and BCNF, as all non-key attributes depend only on the primary key.
- Option B: This violates 2NF due to partial dependency but does not directly address BCNF.
- Option C: This violates 3NF by allowing transitive dependency but does not necessarily violate BCNF.
- Option E: This statement is a valid condition for both 3NF and BCNF.
Find the ratio of the area of an equilateral triangle of side ‘a’ cm to the area of a square having each side equal to ‘a’ cm.
What approximate value will come in place of the question mark (?) in the following question? (Note: You are not expected to calculate the exact value.)...
(5/9 of 2699.81) + (49.88% of 144.18) - (2/7 of 489.77) = ?
59.978% of 800.315 - 229.95 = ? - 24.95% of 200.15
(32.18% of 2399.89 - √624 × 26.25) % of 149.79 = ?
What approximate value will come in place of the question mark (?) in the following question? (Note: You are not expected to calculate the exact value.)...
What approximate value will replace the question mark (?) in the following?
? =...
960.02 of 238.89 ÷ 144.01 of 79.97 = ?
 (1782 ÷ 11.98) ÷ 2.92 × 35.89 + 25% of 541 – 67% of 1299 = ?
99.99% of 9.99 + 299.98% of 129.98 = ?2Â