Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
One of the primary benefits of containerization is that containers share the host operating system (OS) kernel, allowing them to be more lightweight and faster to deploy compared to traditional virtual machines (VMs). In traditional virtualization, each VM runs its own full OS, which consumes considerable system resources and can lead to longer boot times and increased overhead. In contrast, containers encapsulate only the application and its dependencies, eliminating the need for a separate OS instance for each application. This design results in significantly reduced resource usage and quicker start times, making containers an excellent choice for deploying microservices and other cloud-native applications. The efficiency of containerization allows for higher density of applications on a single host, improved scalability, and streamlined development and deployment workflows, particularly when integrated with orchestration tools like Kubernetes. Option A (Containers require a full operating system for each instance) - This statement is incorrect; containers share the host OS, which is a fundamental aspect of their design, allowing them to be lightweight. Option B (Containers are slower to deploy than virtual machines) - Containers are typically faster to deploy than VMs due to their lightweight nature and shared OS, allowing rapid scaling and flexibility in application deployment. Option D (Containers do not support orchestration tools) - Containers can be effectively managed and orchestrated using tools like Kubernetes and Docker Swarm, enhancing their deployment and scaling capabilities. Option E (Containers are not suitable for microservices architecture) - On the contrary, containers are ideally suited for microservices architectures, as they allow developers to package and deploy individual microservices independently.
A certain sum of money becomes Rs. 1500 in 1 year and 2800 in 3 years at certain rate of simple interest. Find the sum of money invested.
The interest earned when a sum is invested at simple interest of 10% p.a., for 3 years, is Rs. 6000. What will be the total amount received after 2 year...
A man deposited 25% of his salary to a bank which offers compound interest at the rate of 10% p.a. If the interest earned by him from the bank after 2 y...
A took a loan of Rs.5320 at simple interest of 20% p.a. and invested the same money in a scheme at simple interest of 30% p.a. Find the profit earned by...
Two persons A and B invest money in two schemes. A invests Rs. 6000 for 2 years in R% CI per annum. B invests Rs.7000 for 2 years in 20% CI per annum. I...
A person named 'P' invested Rs. 48,000 in an SIP called 'X', which provides compound interest at a rate of 50% per annum, compoun...
Amit invested ₹8000 into a SIP that earns simple interest at 12% annually for 3 years. Pawan deposited an unknown amount in a S...
The savings of Arun and Bhaskar are same. The difference between the expenditure of Bhaskar and the savings of both Arun and Bhaskar together is 0. The ...
A sum of Rs. 4000 is invested at simple interest for 2 years. If the rate interest for first year is 15% p.a. while 25% p.a. for second year, then find ...