Question
How likely are you to challenge authority figures, even
if it means facing consequences?Solution
Challenging authority people, especially if it means facing penalties, may be a tough decision to make, and there are several aspects to take into account. Choosing to oppose authority people can be a positive approach to stand up for what is right or to remedy a perceived injustice, but it can also result in negative repercussions such as conflict, disciplinary action, or even job loss. When someone decides to oppose authoritative people, it may show that they are prepared to take chances and stand up for their values, even if it is uncomfortable or unpopular. They may also appreciate communication honesty and openness and be willing to handle difficulties honestly. However, it is critical to thoroughly examine the circumstances and make a choice based on the probable dangers and advantages. As a result, the right answer to the question is b) Somewhat likely. Â
What is the punishment for joining an unlawful assembly and continuing in it without armed weapons?
Abetting commission of offence by public or more than _____ people is punishable with 3 years of imprisonment.
When a document is executed in several parts, each part is:
Presumption as to power attorney lies under which section of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?
When abetment of offence is done which is punishable with death or imprisonment for life, the offence is not committed then:
Presumption as to electronic records is for records ________.
Which section of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 provides for facts Judicially noticeable need not be proved?
According to section 105 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, what is the prescribed method for recording the process of conducting a searc...
Which section of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 defines Private documents?
Which of the following is not an offence against public tranquility?