A sues B for land of which B is in possession, and which, as A asserts, was left to A by the will of C, B’s father. If no evidence were given on either side, who will have the possession of the land?
Section 102 IEA- The burden of proof in a suit or proceeding lies on that person who would fail if no evidence at all were given on either side. Illustrations (a) A sues B for land of which B is in possession, and which, as A asserts, was left to A by the will of C, B’s father. If no evidence were given on either side, B would be entitled to retain his possession. Therefore the burden of proof is on A. (b) A sues B for money due on a bond. The execution of the bond is admitted, but B says that it was obtained by fraud, which A denies. If no evidence were given on either side, A would succeed, as the bond is not disputed and the fraud is not proved. Therefore the burden of proof is on B.
Under section 32 of Registration Act a document for registration can be presented:
Who is the ex-officio chairman of the Council of States?
Under what conditions can an insurer invest in companies belonging to its promoters as laid down in the insurance Act?
In a suit of damages, the amount of damage is a______.
______________ under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 means the accepting, for the purpose of lending or investment, of deposits of money from the publi...
When a person asserts any fact before the court which gives rise to any legal right or liability, the burden of proof lies on__________?
According to Sales of Goods Act, 1930 which of the following accurately describes the legal effect of a person, who has sold goods but continues to pos...
According to Section 76, nothing is an offence, which is done by a person who is or who by reason of:
What are the various ground on the basis of which RBI may cancel a licence granted to a banking company?
Is According to the Contract Act Consideration not necessary_____________