Question
In which of the following cases the Court held that
“Doctrine of acknowledgment “is a part of the substantive Muslim Law of Inheritance and not a rule of Evidence:Solution
In the case of Mohammad Allahabad Khan v. Mohammmed Ismail Khan, the Allahabad High Court held that the Doctrine of Acknowledgment is a part of substantive Muslim law of inheritance and not merely a rule of evidence. The Doctrine of Acknowledgment is a principle under Islamic law that allows an illegitimate child to inherit from its father if the father acknowledges the child as his own. The acknowledgment can be made explicitly or impliedly through conduct, and it creates a legal relationship between the father and the child. The court in this case observed that the Doctrine of Acknowledgment is not merely a rule of evidence, as it creates a legal relationship between the father and the child, and has a significant impact on the rights of the child to inherit from the father. Therefore, the Doctrine of Acknowledgment is an essential part of the substantive Muslim law of inheritance. Option (A) S A Hussain v. Rajamma and option (B) Mohd. Amin v. Vakil Ahmad are not relevant to the Doctrine of Acknowledgment under Muslim law. Option (D) Habibur Rehman v. Altaf Ali is also a case related to Muslim law of inheritance, but it is not related to the Doctrine of Acknowledgment.
Why is anonymity important in certain situations?
In the context of management, what is the purpose of control?
Why is effective networking important in the workplace?
What does temperance entail in personal behavior?
Neutrality is often emphasized in the work of:
What is a common strategy for career advancement?
What is tolerance in the context of interpersonal relations?
According to Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory, what are hygiene factors?
What is the primary ethical concern when public officials engage in nepotism?
What role does emotional intelligence play in civil services/administration?