Question
The Supreme Court Judgment in Palvinder Kaur vs State
of Punjab relates to :Solution
The Supreme Court Judgment in Palvinder Kaur vs State of Punjab relates to confession. The case dealt with the admissibility of a confession made by the accused under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act. The Court held that a confession made to a police officer, which leads to the discovery of incriminating material, is admissible in evidence under Section 27, even if the confession is retracted later. However, the Court also cautioned that the confession should be voluntary and not obtained by inducement, threat, or promise, and should be free from any suspicion of coercion or threat. The case is an important landmark in the law of evidence in India, as it lays down the principles for the admissibility of confessions under Section 27 of the Evidence Act.
Which of the following statement is true?
Who sits 2nd to the left of U?
Four are the same in a certain way thus forms a group. Which among the following does not belong to the group?
Five people are standing in a line facing north R, L, P, J and C, not necessarily in this order. R is standing at one of the extreme ends. Two people ar...
Six persons L, M, N, O, P and Q sit in a straight row facing north. Q sits third to the right of P. L sits immediate left of O. O sits third to the lef...
Five persons are sitting in a row facing north. Driver and Electrician sit at both ends of the row. The plumber sits next to the right of the carpenter....
What is the difference of ages of U and S?
Who among the following sits at extreme left end of the row?
Who is between Vijay and Dhilip?
P, Q, R, S and T are sitting in a straight row, facing north. Neither Q nor S sit at the exact central position of the row. R is adjacent to S, while P ...