Question
Luther Vs. Sagor case deals
with:Solution
The most appropriate answer will be option B that is retroactive effect of recognition as in the case of Luthor Vs. Sagor 1921 it was held that- the recognition of the state was retroactive in effect, thus the change of govt and the delay in recognising the new govt would have no impact before the English courts. It was held that the British Government recognized the Government of Russia and the retrospective effect will be applicable for that recognition.
The income ratio between 'P' and 'Q' is 5:4, while their expenditure ratio is 9:7 respectively. If both manage to save Rs. 10,000 each, what is the diff...
Vicky and Vinay have their monthly incomes in the ratio of 7:9. Their monthly expenditures are Rs. 6200 and Rs. 7800, respectivel...
Nikhil spends x% of his salary on rent, then 30% of the balance on groceries, pays Rs. 6600 for transport, and saves Rs. 5496 from a total income of Rs....
Pawan earns Rs. 40,000, which is 20% less than Bhuvan's income. Bhuvan spends 60% of his income and saves the remaining amount. The savings ratio of Paw...
Income of Deepa is Rs. 60,000. She spends 10% on rent, 25% on clothing, 'a%' on food, 30% on others and saves the rest. If her savings is Rs. 9,000, fin...
- Rahul saves 36% of his monthly income. If his monthly income increases by 18.2% while his monthly savings remain the same, find the increase in his monthly...
The monthly incomes of A and B are in the ratio 3 : 4, and their monthly expenditures are in the ratio 2 : 3. If each of them saves Rs. 4,000 per month,...
- The commission of a salesperson increased by Rs. 450. If the old commission was 18% less than the new commission, then the old commission was:
If 45% of income of ‘R’ is equal to 36% of income of ‘S’, then find the income of ‘R’ is how much percentage of income of ‘S’.
...Bharti's income is 30% higher than Amisha's income, which is Rs. 8000. Bharti spends 25% of his income, and the ratio of Amisha's...
Relevant for Exams:
