Question
Which of the following cases does not explain the maxim
‘Damnum Sine Injuria’? a. Bhim Singh Vs. State of J & K b. Action Vs. Blundell      c. Chesmore Vs. Richards d. Ushaben Vs. Bhagyalaxmi Chitra Mandir.Solution
In the case of Bhim Singh Vs. State of J and K, the principle of Injuria Sine Damnum was applied. In this instance, Bhim Singh was a member of the J&k State Legislative Assembly who was detained by state police while on his way to a legislative assembly vote and detained indefinitely without charge. His wife filed a Habeas Corpus petition to gain his malafide release. The apex Court determined MLA Bhim Singh’s democratic right & awarded him Rs. 50,000 in compensatory losses. In addition, the appropriate police official was penalized for neglect of duty and misconduct.
Which of the following Financial Institutions in India is/are regulated by the Reserve Bank of India?
       I.           Sma...
The provisions relating to "Lay-off, Retrenchment, Closure" are originally defined under which Act?
Which of the following statements is/are correct in regards to Mission Karmayogi?
1.It is related to civil services training
2.It is an In...
What does the term "ideology" refer to in Dunlop's System Theory?Â
What is the purpose of the memorandum of understanding ( MoU ) signed between India and the United States in relation to the semiconductor industry?
The price of an article is increased by 20%. Further, there is a tax of 5% on the increment. If the article costs ₹ 1,331 to the customer, then what ...
At simple interest, a certain sum of money amounts to ₹1,250 in 2 years and to ₹2,000 in 5 years. Find the rate of interest per annum (rounded off t...
Stockholm Syndrome is a mental condition experienced by
Which one of the following statements about the situation in the Ryotwari areas is correct?
What does the term "out of order" typically refer to in the context of loans?Â
Relevant for Exams:
