Which of the following cases does not explain the maxim ‘Damnum Sine Injuria’?
a. Bhim Singh Vs. State of J & K
b. Action Vs. Blundell
c. Chesmore Vs. Richards
d. Ushaben Vs. Bhagyalaxmi Chitra Mandir.
In the case of Bhim Singh Vs. State of J and K, the principle of Injuria Sine Damnum was applied. In this instance, Bhim Singh was a member of the J&k State Legislative Assembly who was detained by state police while on his way to a legislative assembly vote and detained indefinitely without charge. His wife filed a Habeas Corpus petition to gain his malafide release. The apex Court determined MLA Bhim Singh’s democratic right & awarded him Rs. 50,000 in compensatory losses. In addition, the appropriate police official was penalized for neglect of duty and misconduct.
Which of the following is NOT a conductor?
Kanchan Devi was appointed as director general of Dehradun-based Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education (ICFRE) in December 2023.
Whic...
The physics phenomenon when, in polar regions like Alaska and Northern Canada, a splendid display of colors is seen in the sky is called a/an:
According to the information received till March 2022, who was the leader of the House in Rajya Sabha?
Which is the 1st hallmark present on gold jewelry to indicate its purity?
According to Census- 2011, what was the sex ratio in Uttarakhand?
In which of the following writs does the court enquire into the legality of the claim, which a party asserts to a public office and ousts him from its e...
The first ever Industrial Policy Resolution of India was announced in the year _______.
A financial assistance of ________ rupees will be given to the community health centres so that they can be strengthened to meet the standards of sanita...
Machines, tools and implements, and buildings are examples of which type of goods?
