Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
In the case of R v. Bedingfield 1879, the principle of Res Gestae and exception to the hearsay rule was discussed. Lord Justice Cockburn held that the statement was not admissible, since it was something stated by her after it was all over. He said that it was not part of the transaction, that it was said after the transaction was all over, the transaction being the cutting of the throat. This case has made a narrow interpretation of the doctrine of res gestae.
The total monthly salary of Mamta and Rishi is Rs 1,10,000 and the ratio of the expenses of Mamta and Rishi is 7:6 and the ratio of savings of Rishi and...
Monthly income of Sneha is Rs. 32,000 and the ratio of her monthly expenditure to monthly savings is 4:4 respectively. If the average monthly savings of...
The income of Amit is Rs. 12,000 greater than Bhuvan's income. Amit spends 75% of his income, whereas Bhuvan's expenditure is 80% of Amit's expenditure....
799.99 + 1500.12 ÷ 29.98 × 50.01 = ? × 24.96
In the last financial year the ratio of the monthly incomes of Viraj and Rohan was m : n and the ratio of their monthly expenditures was p : n. In the c...
In which of the following years, the difference in no. of students appearing for UIT from the previous year is highest?
Arjun Spends 20% of his income to food, then spends 15% of the remaining amount on rent, followed by 25% of what remains on trave...
Vicky and Vinay have their monthly incomes in the ratio of 7:9. Their monthly expenditures are Rs. 6200 and Rs. 7800, respectivel...
What is the ratio of 'Anil's monthly savings to 'Jaggu's monthly savings if 'Anil' and 'Jaggu' have monthly Income's in a 5:6 ratio, and 'Anil's monthly...
The earnings of Akshat and Beena are in the ratio 7:9, respectively. Akshat utilizes 48% of his income and saves the remainder, while Beena spends Rs.2,...