Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
In the case of R v. Bedingfield 1879, the principle of Res Gestae and exception to the hearsay rule was discussed. Lord Justice Cockburn held that the statement was not admissible, since it was something stated by her after it was all over. He said that it was not part of the transaction, that it was said after the transaction was all over, the transaction being the cutting of the throat. This case has made a narrow interpretation of the doctrine of res gestae.
When evaluating an argument, what does it mean to "beg the question"?
Statement: Is obesity a disease?
Arguments:
I. Yes, Obesity like other diseases impairs the normal functioning of the body.
...
Statement: Should there be a complete ban on extracurricular activities in college.
Arguments:
I. No, the...
Statement: Should school-going children have internet access at home?
Arguments:
I. Yes, because through the internet students can h...
Statement: Should India encourage one child policy, when our population is increasing day by day?
Arguments:
1) Yes, we have to contr...
Statement: Should graduation be made minimum educational qualification for entry level jobs in any public sector organisation?
Argument:
...Statement: Should the government revoke the GST and bring in the previous tax regime?
Argument I: Yes, the state governments are unable to recove...
Statement: Should export of food grains be banned keeping in view the unexpected drought situation in the country?
Argument I: No, it won’t...