In the case of R v. Bedingfield 1879, the principle of Res Gestae and exception to the hearsay rule was discussed. Lord Justice Cockburn held that the statement was not admissible, since it was something stated by her after it was all over. He said that it was not part of the transaction, that it was said after the transaction was all over, the transaction being the cutting of the throat. This case has made a narrow interpretation of the doctrine of res gestae.
A certain sum of money invested at R% p.a. simple interest amounts to Rs.17760after 4 years and Rs.22080after 7 years. If the same sum of money is inves...
Simple interest earned on an amount of Rs.1200 at rate of R% per annum after 4 years is Rs.384. Find the simple interest earned on an amount of Rs.1500 ...
A sum of ₹20,000 is invested at a compound interest rate of 5% per annum for 4 years. What will be the total amount after 4 years, and what is the tot...
Calculate the total interest earned after 2 years on an investment of Rs. 2,500, with an annual compound interest rate of 20%, compounded annually.
The simple interest at k% for k year will be Rs. k on a certain sum. Find the principal amount.
A man invested Rs. 'D' at simple interest of 22% and Rs. 'D + 5000' at simple interest of 18% p.a., for 2 years each. If the interest earned from both i...
₹2,500, when invested for 8 years at a given rate of simple interest per year, amounted to ₹3,725 on maturity. What was the rate of simple interest...
A certain sum of money becomes 5 times of itself in 20 years at simple interest. In how many years does it become double of itself at the same rate of s...
A sum of ₹10,000 is invested in two parts: one part at 12% per annum simple interest and the other part at 8% per annum simple interest. After 3 years...
Akshay invested Rs. 2100 in two schemes P and Q in the respective ratio of 9:5. Scheme P and Q are offering simple interest at the rate of 8% per annum ...