As per Limitation Act, 1963 S. 21. Effect of substituting or adding new plaintiff or defendant.—(1) Where after the institution of a suit, a new plaintiff or defendant is substituted or added, the suit shall, as regards him, be deemed to have been instituted when he was so made a party: Provided that where the court is satisfied that the omission to include a new plaintiff or defendant was due to a mistake made in good faith it may direct that the suit as regards such plaintiff or defendant shall be deemed to have been instituted on any earlier date. (2) Nothing in sub-section (1) shall apply to a case where a party is added or substituted owing to assignment or devolution of any interest during the pendency of a suit or where a plaintiff is made a defendant or a defendant is made a plaintiff..
In the questions, a part of the sentence is highlighted. Below are given alternatives to the highlighted part which may improve the sentence. Choose th...
The children enrolled in low fee charging private schools are seen to perform better in mathematics, despite of better –qualified and more experie...
When the dog inside the house barking for a street dog and the latter retorts, the master does not get involved.
...If the corporation’s previous products are anything to go by, the aim is likely to get to the next level of commodification of human interaction, (A...
The pilgrimage trail was well-trodden, but I didn’t fancing does it alone.
My younger brother and sister help me over my work
I was thinking about this the last time we gone on a big trip.
I was half inclined to turn and go back.
She mentioned that she will call me later.
Select the most appropriate option to substitute the bold segment in the given sentence. If there is no need to substitute it, select ‘No substitution...
