Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Amit can sue Bikash for price of goods at either Kolkata where the cause of action arose or at Delhi where Bikash works for gain (carries out business)
Statements: P > X > Q < R = S ≥ T < U < V ≤ W
Conclusion
I: W > Q
II: R > T
Which one the following symbols should replace the question mark in the given expression, in order to make the expressions L ≤ I as well as N > K ...
Statements: Z > X > D > H ≤ M ≥ N = G
Conclusion
I: M > X
II: H > Z
Statements: O > M = Q > S; M ≥ K > A; Q ≤ O < E
Conclusions: I. O > S II. K < O ...
Statements: A % B & Z % F; F # C & E; E @ P # D
Conclusions : I. C @ P II. A % P ...
Statements: O > P ≥ S = V > N; O ≤ G < D; N < Y > C
Conclusions: I. G > V II. C ≤ O
Statements:
B < C ≤ I = O; C ≥ J ≥ K ≥ N; Z ≤ M ≤ N
Conclusions:
I) O > Z
II) O = Z
...If the expressions, ′X < C ≤ N > E ′, ′N ≥ O′ and ′W ≥ C′ are true then which of the following combinations will be definitely true?
Statements: C ≥ E > M ≤ Z < B; G ≥ Z > K
Conclusions: I. C > K II. G ≥ B ...
Statement: E < F ≤ G = H, I ≥ G ≤ J ≤ K
Conclusion: I. K > E II. H > K