Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Uttarakhand Purv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Ltd. Vs. Northern Coal Field Ltd. In this case, Supreme Court has held that as enshrined in Section 16 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act) and the legislative intent to restrict judicial intervention at pre-reference stage, the Supreme Court held that the issue of limitation would be decided by an arbitrator. It also reaffirmed that the legislative intent of the Arbitration Act is party autonomy and minimal judicial interference in the arbitration process. It observed that the regime of the Arbitration Act outlines that once an arbitrator has been appointed, all objections and issues are to be decided by the arbitrator. The Supreme Court observed that the issue of limitation is a jurisdictional issue which should be decided by the arbitrator in terms of Section 16 of the Arbitration Act and not before the High Court at the pre-reference stage under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act. The Supreme Court observed that once the arbitration agreement is not in dispute, all issue including jurisdictional issues are to be decided by the arbitrator.
Which of the given pairs (Human Disease - Causative Microorganism - Mode of Transmission) is incorrect?
Red rot of Sugarcane is caused by
Which of these statements are accurate regarding the molecular structures of DNA and RNA?
Statements:
1. DNA is a doublestranded molecul...
Which act was passed by the British government to increase their grip on power in India, allowing them to arrest individuals without trial?
Match List I with List II:
List I (Hormone) --- List II (Endocrine Gland)
A) Insulin --- 1) Pitui...
Number of chrormosomes pairs are found in a human cell is _____
Where is the pituitary gland located in the human body?
Which of the following disease is caused by the deficiency of iodine in food?
What are the small openings on the surface of plant leaves called?
What is the name of the outermost layer of the Sun?