Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
The Supreme Court Judgment in R K Malkani v. State of Maharashtra is related to the relevancy of facts forming part of the same transaction. This case deals with Section 6 of the Indian Evidence Act, which states that facts which are so connected with each other as to form part of the same transaction are relevant to prove the existence of any one of them. In this case, the accused was charged with abetment of suicide of his wife, who had written several letters before her death, implicating the accused in her decision to end her life. The prosecution sought to introduce these letters as evidence against the accused. The court held that the letters were admissible under Section 6 as they formed part of the same transaction, i.e., the abetment of suicide. The judgment reaffirms the principle that evidence that forms part of the same transaction is relevant and admissible, even if it is not direct evidence of the crime itself.
A Bread packet is sold at a profit of 20% after a discount of 25%. where the difference between profit and discount is Rs.370 then what will be the ma...
Anita bought 80 pencils for Rs. 96 and she sold them in such a manner so that selling price of 40 pencils is Rs. 72. Find the value of 2(P + 10) if the ...
A dishonest dealer announces selling his articles with a 25% loss but uses 40% lighter weights. What is the percentage of his profit or loss?
C and D invest in a business in a ratio of 4:5. If 10% of the total profit goes to charity and D's share is Rs.900 after the donation, what is the total...
Shashi sells two articles for Rs.25000 each with no loss and no profit in the overall transaction. If one article is sold at 16(2/3)% loss, then the oth...
The ratio of cost price to the marked price of an article is 5:8. The article had been marked above its cost price by Rs. 300. If the article was sold a...
Ravi purchased 6 notebooks, 18 markers, and 12 highlighters for Rs. 240, Rs. 1080, and Rs. 360, respectively, from a seller. By selling each notebook an...
A vendor acquired a piece of clothing for Rs. ‘a’ and marked it 160% above its cost price, and sold it after giving two successive discounts of 900 ...
Mayank gives 25% discount to his customer but he sells only smuggled goods and as a bribe he pays 10% on the cost price. Find what should be the Marked ...
A merchant initially raised the price of a product by 25% and subsequently by an additional 20%. After providing a 24% discount on the final price, he g...