It was held in this case that The confession of an accused person against a co-accused is not evidence in the ordinary sense of the term. It does not come within the meaning of evidence contained in sec. 3 of the Indian Evidence Act inasmuch as it is not required to be given on oath, nor in the presence of the accused and cannot be tested by cross-examination.
The salary of A is 50% more than the salary of B. If A got a 50% rise in his salary and B got a 25% rise in his salary. then the percentage increase in ...
A man invested all his current month income in starting of a new business in which he spends 40% in advertisement 30% of remaining in furniture 25% of r...