Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
The Supreme Court in the landmark judgment struck down section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 which provided provisions for the arrest of those who posted allegedly offensive content on the internet upholding freedom of expression. This Section 66A defined the punishment for sending “offensive” messages through a computer or any other communication device like a mobile phone or tablet and a conviction of it can fetch a maximum three years of jail and a fine. The case emphasized on the fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India, which challenged the constitutional validity of section 66A and led to the struck down of section 66A of the Information Technology Act 2000.
According to Section 2(g) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 'judgment' means _______.
The purpose of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 as set out in Preamble is
Adultery under IPC is
The oath of office to the governor is administered by
How many parties are there in a contract of guarantee?
The corporate insolvency resolution process shall be completed _______________ from the date of admission of the application to initiate such process
What action is permissible for the Court if it determines that a person accused under section 15 is likely to evade notice service as per the Contempt o...
In case a Legal Disability continues up to the death of that person__________.
According to Section 36(4) of the Code on Wages, 2019, what is the purpose of carrying forward excess allocable surplus or minimum bonus to the succeedi...
Landmark case of Wright v. Tantham is related to: