Get Started with ixamBee
Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
In this case it was held that for the purpose of entering into a contract two things are essential: (1) To have complete knowledge of the facts of the offer or proposal; and (2) Acceptance of the offer. To convert a proposal into an agreement both knowledge and assent to it must be present. However, in the given case, both were missing. As the plaintiff had no knowledge and hadn’t given his approval or accepted the proposal so there did not exist a valid contract between the two. In the case it was held that for creating or entering into a valid contract there has to be knowledge and assent to the offeree made by the proposer.
According to Section 2(g) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 'judgment' means _______.
The purpose of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 as set out in Preamble is
Adultery under IPC is
The oath of office to the governor is administered by
How many parties are there in a contract of guarantee?
The corporate insolvency resolution process shall be completed _______________ from the date of admission of the application to initiate such process
What action is permissible for the Court if it determines that a person accused under section 15 is likely to evade notice service as per the Contempt o...
In case a Legal Disability continues up to the death of that person__________.
According to Section 36(4) of the Code on Wages, 2019, what is the purpose of carrying forward excess allocable surplus or minimum bonus to the succeedi...
Landmark case of Wright v. Tantham is related to:
