New Enroll here to Join NaBFID Analyst Into Class on May 6

    Question

    The famous case of Lalman Shukla vs. Gauri Datt is

    related to:
    A Invitation to offer Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    B Revocation of offer Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    C Conditional offer Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    D Knowledge of offer before acceptance Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

    Solution

    In this case it was held that for the purpose of entering into a contract two things are essential: (1) To have complete knowledge of the facts of the offer or proposal; and (2) Acceptance of the offer. To convert a proposal into an agreement both knowledge and assent to it must be present. However, in the given case, both were missing.  As the plaintiff had no knowledge and hadn’t given his approval or accepted the proposal so there did not exist a valid contract between the two. In the case it was held that for creating or entering into a valid contract there has to be knowledge and assent to the offeree made by the proposer.

    Practice Next