Question
The famous case of Lalman Shukla vs. Gauri Datt is
related to:Solution
In this case it was held that for the purpose of entering into a contract two things are essential: (1) To have complete knowledge of the facts of the offer or proposal; and (2) Acceptance of the offer. To convert a proposal into an agreement both knowledge and assent to it must be present. However, in the given case, both were missing.  As the plaintiff had no knowledge and hadn’t given his approval or accepted the proposal so there did not exist a valid contract between the two. In the case it was held that for creating or entering into a valid contract there has to be knowledge and assent to the offeree made by the proposer.
In the question, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the conclusion (s) among given three conclusions is /are definitely true and t...
Statements: Q > R ≥ L = O ≤ M > S = T ≤ N
Conclusion
I: N ≤ L
II: N > L
In the question, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the conclusion(s) among given three conclusions is /are definitely true and th...
What should come in the place of question mark, in the given expressions to make ‘T ≤ Z’ always true?
R > S = T ≤ U ≤ V _?_ W = X ≤ Y...
In Which of the following expressions does the expression ‘ H ≥ D ’ definitely hold true?
In which of the following expressions will the expression ‘M ≥ N ' and ‘Q < O’ be definitely true?
In the question, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the following conclusion(s) among the three conclusions is/are true and then g...
Statements: P < Q = R ≥ S = T; R < U; R = W
Conclusion: I. W ≥ T II. U < P
...Statements:  T < U = S ≤  O, C > Y ≥ X, T > K = XÂ
Conclusions
I. O > K
II. C < T
III. U > K
ÂIn the following question the relationship between different elements is given in the statements followed by three conclusions I, II and III. Read the ...
