Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Get Started with ixamBee
Start learning 50% faster. Sign in nowIn 2013, the Supreme Court judgment dealt a big blow to gay rights activists. The apex court Bench upheld the constitutional validity of the Section 377 making gay sex an offence punishable with upto life imprisonment. The Supreme Court of India reinstated Section 377 of the IPC in Suresh Kumar Koushal and another v NAZ Foundation and others in 2013. The Delhi High Court judgment in 2009 had decriminalized Section 377 Naz Foundation vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi. On September 6th, 2018 the five-judge Bench partially struck down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, decriminalising same-sex relations between consenting adults. LGBT individuals are now legally allowed to engage in consensual intercourse. The Court has upheld provisions in Section 377 that criminalise non-consensual acts or sexual acts performed on animals.
As per the Special Contract Act how can delivery to the bailee be effectively made?
A warrant trial is instituted:
Which of the following statements about arrest without warrant under BNSS, 2023 is correct?
Under The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act. 2013, in the constitution of Internal Complaints Committe...
In the case of Rupchand vs Raghuwanshi 1964, the Supreme Court has held that:
Immovable property does not include:
Which of the following fundamental right/ restriction is only available to/ against a citizen of India?
What action is permissible for the Court if it determines that a person accused under section 15 is likely to evade notice service as per the Contempt o...
Ramesh instigates a child Pappu to commit murder and the murder is committed in consequence. Who is liable?
If the buyer has paid the purchase money and the seller has not delivered the possession of property within reasonable time, buyer can: