Answer-In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court has held that filing of Complaint for Dishonor of...

Question

Accepted Answer

In A C Narayan vs State of Maharashtra, the court held that that the powershyofshyattorney holder may be allowed to file, appear and depose for the purpose of issue of process for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the NI Act. An exception to the above is when the powershyofshyattorney holder of the complainant does not have a personal knowledge about the transactions then he cannot be examined. However, where the attorney holder of the complainant is in charge of the business of the complainant payee and the attorney holder alone is personally aware of the transactions, there is no reason why the attorney holder cannot depose as a witness. Nevertheless, an explicit assertion as to the knowledge of the powershyofshyattorney holder about the transaction in question must be specified in the complaint.

In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court has held that filing of Complaint for Dishonor of Cheque through power of attorney is permissible?

Detailed Solution

More Other Laws and Acts Questions

Hey! Ask a query

Please Register/Login

RBI Grade B 2026 Phase 1 Memory Based Paper