New Enroll here to Join NaBFID Analyst Into Class on May 6

    Question

    The Court held that Section 4 of the Specific Relief Act

    would only be available with regard to civil matters and not to criminal proceedings was held in the case of _____________
    A Shakuntala Devi v. Chamru Mehta Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    B East India Hotels v. Syndicate Bank Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    C Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. V. Amritsar Gas Services & Ors. Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    D M/S Gujarat Bottling Co. Ltd. Vs Coca Cola Co. & Ors. Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

    Solution

    East India Hotels v. Syndicate Bank : It was held that the purpose behind Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act is to restrain a person from using force and to dispossess a person without his consent otherwise than in the due course of law . Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. V. Amritsar Gas Services & Ors .: It was held that a contract which is in its nature determinable cannot be enforced by the Court. M/S Gujarat Bottling Co. Ltd. Vs Coca Cola Co. & Ors .: It was held that granting interim injunction is at the discretion of the Court and its object is to protect the plaintiff against injury by violation of his right for which he could not be adequately compensated in damages recoverable in the action if the uncertainty were resolved in his favour at the trial.

    Practice Next