In which case it was laid that it is not necessary that the consideration should move from the promisee himself?
The Court held that it is not necessary that the consideration should move from the promisee himself as laid down under section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 which says that ‘Consideration may be given by the promise or anyone on behalf of promisee. Taylor v. Caldwell: The doctrine of impossibility/frustration through destruction of the subject matter was established in this case. NAFED v. Alimenta S.A.: A foreign award was declared as unenforceable on the ground that one of the provisions of the Agreement in question was hit by Section 32 of the Indian Contract Act and thus violative of public policy of India. Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Ltd. v. Selfridge & Co. Ltd .: Privity of contract- only parties to a contract can sue for a breach of the contract.
Which of the following is not considered a corporate person under Indian law?
What shall be credited to the Depositor Education and Awareness Fund as laid down under the Banking Regulation Act?
In which of the following offences, the element of mens rea is required to be proved?
According to Section 77 of the Social Security Code the compensation under Section 76 shall be paid________.
In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that registered documents have better evidentiary value over non registered documents?
The thief in order to steal something, creeps after sunset into a ship at a port- hole between decks and then leaves before sunrise. He has committed
What was held by the Court in the case of Powell v. Lee?
Under what article of the Constitution of India can the President take over the administration of a state in case its constitutional machinery breaks do...
A previous Judgment is relevant to bar a second suit or a trial as per which rule of evidence?
Order XIX of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 related to __________.