Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
The Court held that it is not necessary that the consideration should move from the promisee himself as laid down under section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 which says that ‘Consideration may be given by the promise or anyone on behalf of promisee. Taylor v. Caldwell: The doctrine of impossibility/frustration through destruction of the subject matter was established in this case. NAFED v. Alimenta S.A.: A foreign award was declared as unenforceable on the ground that one of the provisions of the Agreement in question was hit by Section 32 of the Indian Contract Act and thus violative of public policy of India. Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Ltd. v. Selfridge & Co. Ltd .: Privity of contract- only parties to a contract can sue for a breach of the contract.
In May 2023, which of the following states became the first state in the country to launch a state robotics framework with a vision to create a sustaina...
Consider the following statement:
1. Recently a round 50 Odonata species were identified on Mudumalai Tiger Reserve (MTR)
2. Odonata i...
Which country had topped the "World Happiness Index" for the year 2023 ?
What is the primary threat to Gangetic river dolphins mentioned in the Freedom on the Net 2023 publication?
Duncan Passage is a strait in the Bay of Bengal that divides Little Andaman from which of the following?
Asia Cup 2023 will be hosted by _________________ .
Which of the following statement is/are correct about Card-on-File Tokenisation initiative:
Recently , St...
Exercise SLINEX-23 held between which two nation
Which regulatory body has approved the stake acquisition in climate technologies' business of Emerson Electric Co by BCP Emerald Aggregator LP?
Which ministry founded the Centre for Trade and Investment Law (CTIL) at the Indian Institute of Foreign Trade?