Question
As per the Judgment in case of Keshavananda Bharti
clause (4) of Art. 13 of the constitution in relation to Art. 368 has been______Solution
he 24th amendment to the Indian Constitution was enacted by the then Indira Gandhi government in November 1971. The objective was to nullify the Supreme Court’s ruling that had left the Parliament with no power to curtail the Fundamental Rights. Clause (4) was inserted in Article 13, which states: “Nothing in this article shall apply to any amendment of this Constitution made under article 368.” This provision added more power to the Parliament when it comes to amending the Constitution. It brought Fundamental Rights within the purview of amendment procedure and judicial intervention or review of those amendments was prohibited. This amendment was challenged in the Keshavananda Bharti case and the court upheld it’s validity and also held that parliament has amending power to part III of the constitution subjected to not amending or affecting the basic structure of the constitution.
Which area of collaboration is included under the India–Oman Free Trade Agreement?
Which partnership or initiative is mentioned as part of BioE3 implementation to foster state-level action?
Who is the newly appointed Chief Minister of Odisha?
What is the purpose of the knowledge-sharing platform launched by the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI)?
Which chemical compound is commonly used for artificial ripening of mangoes?
Which country had the highest number of its nationals granted nationality in OECD countries in 2021, according to the OECD's International Migration Out...
What is the primary aim of the 'Mission Arun Himveer' initiative launched in Arunachal Pradesh?
What is the objective of ONGC's Sea Survival Centre inaugurated by PM Modi in Goa?
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) notified that the Central Recordkeeping Agency (CRA) will replace Pension Funds as the Financial Information Provider (F...
Where is the headquarters of the New Development Bank (NDB)?