Question
As per the Judgment in case of Keshavananda Bharti
clause (4) of Art. 13 of the constitution in relation to Art. 368 has been______Solution
he 24th amendment to the Indian Constitution was enacted by the then Indira Gandhi government in November 1971. The objective was to nullify the Supreme Court’s ruling that had left the Parliament with no power to curtail the Fundamental Rights. Clause (4) was inserted in Article 13, which states: “Nothing in this article shall apply to any amendment of this Constitution made under article 368.” This provision added more power to the Parliament when it comes to amending the Constitution. It brought Fundamental Rights within the purview of amendment procedure and judicial intervention or review of those amendments was prohibited. This amendment was challenged in the Keshavananda Bharti case and the court upheld it’s validity and also held that parliament has amending power to part III of the constitution subjected to not amending or affecting the basic structure of the constitution.
Where will the training of astronauts be conducted for Gaganyaan Mission?
Which of the following statement is correct about Khelo India Para Games, 2023?
I. The 1st edition of Khelo India Para Games 2023 is being organi...
What was the global Skytrax ranking of Delhi IGI Airport in 2024?
Which of the following awards is NOT conferred for excellence in dance?
Under which climatic conditions do the late rite soils develop?
Where are the printing presses facility of Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran Pvt. Limited is situated?Â
Which of the following is/are NOT a non-justifiable right?
1. Right to work
2. Equal pay for equal work (for men and women)
3. ...
The government of India has extended the Foreign Trade Policy from earlier September 30, 2021 to_____ now?
Which of the following won the 'NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY AWARDTRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH' in National Technology Week 2023?
What was the reason for the gathering of people at Jallianwala Bagh to protest and oppose?