Continue with your mobile number
Popat Bahiru Govardhane v. Land Acquisition Officer, 2013 ü In the present case, it was held by the Hon’ble Court that the limitation Act applies to courts and not to quasi-judicial authorities. ü Furthermore, it was held that the law of limitation may possibly austerely affect a particular party but, nonetheless has to be applied when the statute prescribes the same. ü Moreover, that the Court(s) are devoid of the power to extend the period of limitation on equitable grounds, even if the statutory provision may cause hardship or inconvenience to a particular party.
119 × 13 + 150/100 × 850 =?
230192 172 ? 122 100
...What will come in place of the question mark (?) in the following series?
12, 13, 22, 47, 96, 177, ?
195% of 1420 + 72 × 25 =?
12, 18, 30, 54, ?, 198
25 25 37.5 ? 328.125 1804.6875
110, 112, 116, 122, 130, ?
4, 4, 12, 60, ?, 3780
4, 9, 25, ?, 121, 169
161 173 191 215 245 ?
...