Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India- Curfew – Section 144 CrPC The case primarily dealt with the suspension of the internet in the State of Jammu and Kashmir post revocation of Article 370 of the Constitution of India, however, one of the issues in the case was regarding the excessive imposition of Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973, which empowers a magistrate to impose restrictions on movement and speech in areas where trouble could erupt. The Supreme Court of India, in this case, held that Section 144 CrPC cannot be used as a tool to prevent legitimate expression of opinion. The court further held that Section 144 CrPC is not only remedial but also preventive, and shall be exercised only in cases where there is danger or apprehension of danger. The jurisdiction of Section 144 of CrPC shall not be used to suppress the legitimate expression of opinion or grievance or exercise of any democratic rights
The data about sales and advertisement expenditure of a firm is given below
Suppose the wedding dress industry is a perfectly competitive constant cost industry. Suppose also that market demand for wedding dresses is described b...
____ in reserve requirements ____ the money supply since it causes the money multiplier to ____.
lumpsum tax is levied on the monopolist, the burden will be borne by
If bxy = 0.20 and rxy = 0.50, then byx is equal to:
Which of the following is NOT one of the four priorities on which the budget proposal of 2022-23 rests?
Which of the follow statements about price discrimination is not true?
Which of the following four-firm concentration ratios is most consistent with perfect competition?
What is the Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR)?
Which of the following statements is (in general) true?