Continue with your mobile number
Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India- Curfew – Section 144 CrPC The case primarily dealt with the suspension of the internet in the State of Jammu and Kashmir post revocation of Article 370 of the Constitution of India, however, one of the issues in the case was regarding the excessive imposition of Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973, which empowers a magistrate to impose restrictions on movement and speech in areas where trouble could erupt. The Supreme Court of India, in this case, held that Section 144 CrPC cannot be used as a tool to prevent legitimate expression of opinion. The court further held that Section 144 CrPC is not only remedial but also preventive, and shall be exercised only in cases where there is danger or apprehension of danger. The jurisdiction of Section 144 of CrPC shall not be used to suppress the legitimate expression of opinion or grievance or exercise of any democratic rights
Act of guardian giving consent on behalf of a child for his benefit in good faith below ________ years is___________:
Which of the following Articles in the Constitution deals with the applicability of habeas corpus?
Which of the following phrases is not part of the Preamble of the Indian Constitution?
As per S. 79 of the Indian Penal Code which of the following is not true?
Which of the following is no more a recognized form of punishment in India as per IPC?
Which part of the Constitution contains provisions related to Panchayats?
Aman a citizen of India has committed a murder in Uganda, he can be tried for the offence of Murder in?
Right to private defence is covered under which sections of IPC?
Which of the following is not subjected to causing of death of person in private defence?
Which section of IPC provides for construction of transportation as imprisonment for life?