Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Lalita Kumari v. State of UP – FIR mandatory in cognizable cases The writ petition has been filed in the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution by Lalita Kumari (minor) through her father for the issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus or directions of like nature for the protection of his daughter who has been kidnapped. The hon'ble Supreme Court gave various directions- It is mandatory to register an FIR u/s 154 of the Code, if the information discloses the commission of a cognizable offence and no preliminary inquiry is permissible in such a situation. If the information does not disclose a cognizable offence but indicates the necessity for an inquiry, a preliminary inquiry may be conducted to ascertain whether information reveals any cognizable offence.
Which of the following sets of thinkers is not categorized on common lines of thinking / belong to the same school of thought?
Any application for which no period of application is provided can be filed within:
A contract with a minor is _________
Mortgage by deposit of title deeds is a type of mortgage in which :
The Principal Bench of the Tribunal shall be at New Delhi which shall be presided over by the ________________Companies Act
A person arrested cannot be detained for:
……………..of Factories may direct the occupier of any factory to provide suitable seating arrangements.
...
Under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 which of the following properties cannot be attached in execution of a decree?
Under which provision of CPC, execution of decree for specific performance for restitution of conjugal rights or for an injunction is provided:
Specific Relief Act, 1963 is the product of _____________