Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Lalita Kumari v. State of UP – FIR mandatory in cognizable cases The writ petition has been filed in the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution by Lalita Kumari (minor) through her father for the issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus or directions of like nature for the protection of his daughter who has been kidnapped. The hon'ble Supreme Court gave various directions- It is mandatory to register an FIR u/s 154 of the Code, if the information discloses the commission of a cognizable offence and no preliminary inquiry is permissible in such a situation. If the information does not disclose a cognizable offence but indicates the necessity for an inquiry, a preliminary inquiry may be conducted to ascertain whether information reveals any cognizable offence.
Tort has been derived from the word_______.
The Commissioner of Food Safety for the State under Food Safety and Standards Act is appointed by
General Insurance business covers which type/s of business/es?
As per the SEBI Act the Chairperson or any board members can relinquish office after a notice period of____.
A sells a property owned by him to B and C. B and C are different buyers and have purchased the property in two unequal halves with different amount of ...
A person who finds goods belonging to another, and takes them into his custody, is subject to the same responsibility as a________________
Under limitation Act applicant includes:
Appeal to SAT under SEBI Act lies against an order of
According to Indian Partnership Act, 1932 Which of the following best describes a partnership?
Which of the following do not constitute evidence within the meaning of Section 3 of the Evidence Act?