Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
In this case the Supreme Court held that the effect of setting aside an ex parte decree is that the suit is restored and the court should proceed to decide the suit as it stood before the decree. The ex parte is a decree under s.2(2) of the Code and therefore, an aggrieved party can also file an appeal under section 96(2) of the Code.
Statements: R ≥ S = T; R < U < V; W > X > V
Conclusion:
I. U > T
II. T < V
Statements: K @ L; M & O, N % L, K $ O
Conclusions:
I. O @ L
II. M @ L
<...Statements: Q % R & L @ T $ D; W % Q # P
Conclusions : I. D % R II. Q % L I...
Statements: C = A ≤ H < K ≥ L = Q; S = T ≥ K
Conclusion: I. C < T II. A = S
...Statements: A $ B @ D & E @ G % H, F & A, G $ J
Conclusions: I. A # H II. D $ J
...In the question, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the conclusion (s) among given two conclusions is /are definitely true and the...
Statements: T < U = V = W < X < Y; Z = Y < R < S < O
Conclusions:
I. Z > U
II. T < O
Statement: A≤B ≤C>D ; E<D ;F>E
Conclusions:
I. D>A
II. E<C
Statements: Q > P > R ≥ N; L ≥ Q; O = M < N
Conclusions:
I. P > L
II. O < R
III. L > O
Statements: C > G > E; E = F; G < H
Conclusions: I) F < G
II) E < C
III) C > H