Question
The maxim "once a mortgage always a mortgage" was
applied in the case of-Solution
This maxim was applied in the case of- Mritunjoy Pani And Another vs Narmanda Bala Sasmal And Another on 14 March, 1961- The position, in our opinion, is very clear and in the absence of any special statutory provision to the contrary is governed by s. 90, Trusts Act. The defendant is a mortgagee and, apart from special statutes, the only way in which a mortgage can be terminated as between the parties to it is by the act of the parties themselves, by merger or by an order of the Court. The maxim "once a mortgage always a mortgage" applies. Therefore, when the defendant entered upon possession he was there as a mortgagee and being a mortgagee the plaintiffs have a right to redeem unless there is either a contract between the parties or a merger or a special statute to debar them."
A re-examination of a case for lack of jurisdiction made by a higher court is?
What was held by the Court in the case of Powell v. Lee?
The provision of burden of proving fact especially within knowledge is present in
According to the Limitation Act, what happens to a suit, appeal, or application if it is made after the prescribed period, even if limitation has not be...
As per the provisions of the Indian Contract Act in a contract, free consent is considered to be absent when ____________
 What does ‘R’ in SARFAESI stands for?
According to the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 what does petty organized crime mean?
For refreshing memory a witness may refer a writing_____.
The famous case of Lalman Shukla vs. Gauri Datt is related to:
Which section deals with the relevancy of motive, preparation, and previous or subsequent conduct?Â