Question
The maxim "once a mortgage always a mortgage" was
applied in the case of-Solution
This maxim was applied in the case of- Mritunjoy Pani And Another vs Narmanda Bala Sasmal And Another on 14 March, 1961- The position, in our opinion, is very clear and in the absence of any special statutory provision to the contrary is governed by s. 90, Trusts Act. The defendant is a mortgagee and, apart from special statutes, the only way in which a mortgage can be terminated as between the parties to it is by the act of the parties themselves, by merger or by an order of the Court. The maxim "once a mortgage always a mortgage" applies. Therefore, when the defendant entered upon possession he was there as a mortgagee and being a mortgagee the plaintiffs have a right to redeem unless there is either a contract between the parties or a merger or a special statute to debar them."
рдирд┐рдореНрдирд▓рд┐рдЦрд┐рдд рдореЗрдВ рд╕реЗ рдЕрд░реНрджреНрдзрддрддреНрд╕рдо рд╢рдмреНрдж рдХрд╛ рдЪрдпрди рдХреАрдЬрд┐рдП-
тАШрдЭрд░рдирд╛тАЩ рдХрд╛ рддрддреНрд╕рдо рд╢рдмреНрдж рд╣реИ
'рдЙрдерд▓рд╛' рд╢рдмреНрдж рдХрд╛ рд╡рд┐рд▓реЛрдо рд╣реИрдГ
рдирд┐рдореНрдирд▓рд┐рдЦрд┐рдд рдореЗрдВ рд╕реЗ рджрдВрддреНрдп рдзреНрд╡рдирд┐ рд╣реИ :
рд╕реМрджрд╛рдорд┐рдиреА рдХрд╛ рдкрд░реНрдпрд╛рдпрд╡рд╛рдЪреА рдирд╣реАрдВ┬а рд╣реИ -
рджрд┐рдП рдЧрдП рд╡рд╛рдХреНрдп рдореЗрдВ рдХрд╛рд▓реЗ рд╢рдмреНрджреЛрдВ рдХреЗ рд▓рд┐рдП рд╕рд╣реА рд╢рдмреНрджреЛрдВ рд╡рд╛рд▓реЗ рд╡рд┐рдХрд▓реНрдк...
рдирд┐рдореНрдирд▓рд┐рдЦрд┐рдд рдкреНрд░рд╢реНрди рдореЗрдВ , рдЪрд╛рд░ рд╡рд┐рдХрд▓реНрдкреЛрдВ рдореЗрдВ рд╕реЗ , рдЙрд╕ рд╡рд┐рдХрд▓реНрдк рдХрд╛ я┐╜...
1529 рдИ. рдХреЛ рдЖрджрд┐рдХрд╛рд▓ рдХреА рдЕрдВрддрд┐рдо рд╕реАрдорд╛ рдорд╛рдирддреЗ рд╣реИрдВ?
рд╕реВрдХреНрд╖реНрдо рдХрд╛ рд╡рд┐рд▓реЛрдо рд╢рдмреНрдж рдХреНрдпрд╛ рд╣реЛрдЧрд╛ ?
'рдкрд░рд╛рдзреАрди рд╕рдкрдиреЗрд╣реВрдБ рд╕реБрдЦ рдирд╛рд╣реАрдВ' рдХрд╛ рдЕрд░реНрде рдХреНрдпрд╛ рд╣реИ?