Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
In this case Wazirey was declared insolvent on the 31st October, 1927, and an official receiver was appointed to take charge of the assets of the insolvent. The receiver executed the sale deed and was registered also. The present case was filed for possession of the two houses(assets of insolvent). The suit was contested on the grounds inter alia that the defendant was not bound by the sale deed executed by the receiver as he had no power to do so and that the houses belonged to his wife and mother. Here the court held that the Insolvency Act would prevail over the Transfer of Property Act.
According to Section 2(g) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 'judgment' means _______.
The purpose of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 as set out in Preamble is
Adultery under IPC is
The oath of office to the governor is administered by
How many parties are there in a contract of guarantee?
The corporate insolvency resolution process shall be completed _______________ from the date of admission of the application to initiate such process
What action is permissible for the Court if it determines that a person accused under section 15 is likely to evade notice service as per the Contempt o...
In case a Legal Disability continues up to the death of that person__________.
According to Section 36(4) of the Code on Wages, 2019, what is the purpose of carrying forward excess allocable surplus or minimum bonus to the succeedi...
Landmark case of Wright v. Tantham is related to: