Question
In State of Maharashtra v. M.H. George it was held
that____________Solution
In this case the Court decided the issue as to whether a foreigner committing an offence within the Indian territory shall be held liable under the Indian Penal Code or not. It was held that a foreigner who is committing an offence within India’s territorial limits cannot use lack of knowledge or unawareness as defence of ignorance of the law of the land. Thus, will be held liable for such an offence. It has been inferred from this case that phraseology of the statute can cover an offense under strict liability and bar the mental element. Therefore, nature of the mischief at which the arrangement is pointed in some cases albeit strict liability is deduced strictly on the facts of the case where is depicted as a grave social malevolence. Â
Who is the Judge in case of Ashby Vs. White?
Confession in front of police officer when valid?
According to Code 59 (1) of the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020, what is the time limit for making an application to the ...
A company may issue sweat equity shares of a class of shares already issued if authorized by a Special Resolution which shall specify _____________
To constitute a tort, there must be:
What is the responsibility of a person who finds goods belonging to another, and takes them into his custody, as per the Indian Contract Act?
A dormant company is a company __________________
The terms "Pledge", "Pawnor" and "Pawnee" has been defined under which section of the Contract Act?
All agreements are not contract if it is________________
The State Chief Information Commissioner and the State Information Commissioners shall be appointed by the Governor on the recommendation of a committee...