Get Started with ixamBee
Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Section 167 of Indian Evidence Act - No new trial for improper admission or rejection of evidence –– The improper admission or rejection of evidence shall not be ground of itself for a new trial or reversal of any decision in any case, if it shall appear to the Court before which such objection is raised that, independently of the evidence objected to and admitted, there was sufficient evidence to justify the decision, or that, if the rejected evidence had been received, it ought not to have varied the decision.
Statements: F > G ≥ H; I ≥ J < H; J > K > L
Conclusions:
I. F > L
II. H ≥ K
III. G ≥ J
Statement: A < Z > I < B > S = O ≤ N
Conclusions:
I. S= N
II. B > O
Statements: N $ Q, Q @ M, M % S, S % T
Conclusions : I. S # Q II. S & Q III. M & T
...In the question, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the conclusion (s) among given three conclusions is /are definitely true and t...
Statements: N & C, C # I, I @ L, L % Y
Conclusions: I. C & Y II. L # N
...Statements: Z > Y ≥ X; I < N ≤ L; F < I > D > Z
Conclusions:
I. L > F
II. X < N
III. Y < I
Statements: V > R ≥ W < Z; X ≤ W; U < R ≤ Y
Conclusions:
I. X < Z
II. W < Y
III. Z > U
Which of the following symbols should replace the sign ($) and (*) respectively in the given expression in order to make the expression A ≥ J and P ...
Statements: A % B & G @ T $ D; W % A # P
Conclusions : I. D % B II. A % G ...
Statement: C > S > F > B > L; I > B > T
Conclusion: I. I > L II. T < C
