Question
The Wagan Mound Case
discusses:Solution
In order to calculate the damages remoteness test of directness was replaced with foreseeability in the Wagan Mound case. In this case a large quantity of oil was spilt into Sydney Harbour from the Wagon Mound and it drifted under the wharf where the claimants were oxyacetylene welding. The resulting fire caused extensive damage to the wharf and to vessels moored nearby. The Privy Council replaced the direct consequence test with the requirement that, in order to be recoverable, damage must be foreseeable in all the circumstances, thus, although pollution was a foreseeable consequence of the spillage, an outbreak of fire was not.
Statement:
Some dog are tigers.
Only a few tigers are lions.
All lions are cat.
Conclusion:
I. Some dog being lion is...
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at varianc...
Statements:Â
Only a few Comedians are Hosts.
All Hosts are Anchors.
No Anchor is a Show.
Conclusions:
I. Some Comedi...
Statements:
Only a few A are B.
No B is C.
All C are Z.
Conclusions:
I. Some A can be B.
II. Some C can...
In the question below there are three statements followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the three given statements to be true ev...
Statements:
No construction is building.
No building is foundation.
Every foundation is apartment.
Conclusions:
I. So...
Statements:
Only a few Elements is Compounds.
Only a few Acids is Elements.
No Acid is Neutral.
Conclusions:
I. Every...
In the questions given below there are three statements followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the three given statements to be ...
Statements:
Only a few Barber is Patient.
No Patient is Open.
Only a few Teacher is Doctor.
Conclusion:
I. All Doctor...
Statements:
Some mats are bedsheets.
All bedsheets are chairs.
Some chairs are desks.
Conclusions:
I. Some desks...