Welcome to ixamBee
Continue with your mobile number
These two tests are useful to determine whether the damages are remote or not. The Test Of Reasonable Foresight If the consequences of a wrongful act could be foreseen by a reasonable man, then they are not too remote. If on the other hand, a reasonable man could not have foreseen the consequences, then they are too remote. And, an individual shall be liable only for the consequences which are not too remote i.e. which could be foreseen. The Test Of Directness According to the test of directness, a person is liable for all the direct consequences of his wrongful act, whether he could foresee them or not; because consequences which directly follow a wrongful act are not too remote.
Neither of my parents(A)/is currently (B)/in paid employment, (C)/because of the pandemic (D).
Now I have come (A)/ to know why he always remains at (B)/ loggers-head with his wife and mother-in-law (C)/ No Error (D).
I had to (A)/call for (B)/all my strength (C)/to finish the marathon (D).
It was he who came running in the house with the news about the earthquake.
Neither the central object also any of the material immediately around it can be observed at optical wavelengths because of the thick screen of interven...
All the landmines, weighing among one kg to 10 kg were planted on the route to target security forces.
Read the sentence to find out whether there is any grammatical or idiomatic error in it. The error, if any, will be in one part of the sentence. The le...
They persisted(A)/ on their going(B)/ in spite of rain.(C)
Many archaeologists believe that the ring of megaliths was probably both (A)/a temple and a settlement at the same time, a simultaneous cultural and cul...
On our attempting to restore (a) / the picture to its original condition (b) / almost irreparable damage was discovered (c) / No error (d)
