Question
The decision in the case of R Vs. Bedingfield was
overruled in the case of ?Solution
Actually the decision of Bedingfield case was too strict. However, this decision was overruled in the case of Ratten v.R 1972 where under common law, the doctrine of Res Gestae was defined in liberal and wider terms. In this case it was held that the mere fact that evidence of a witness includes evidence as to words spoken by another person who is not called is no objection to its admissibility. Words spoken are facts just as much as any other action by a human being. Such evidence may not be inadmissible, when it is not led, not to prove the truth of the statement but the fact that it was made.
Select the correct combination of mathematical signs that can sequentially replace the ‘*’ signs and balance the given equation.
16 * 5 * 35 ...
4 – 10 × 5 + 9 ÷ 3 = 51
Select the correct combination of mathematical signs that can sequentially replace '*' sign and balance the equation given below.
90 * 5 * 15 * 2...
If the ‘-’ and ‘×’ are interchanged, What will be the value of the following equation?
34 × 22 + 192 ÷ 12 – 8
...Select the correct sequence of mathematical signs that can sequentially replace the ‘#’ signs and balance the given equation.
56 # 8 # 4 # 32...
If '@' means ' X ', '$' means '-', '#' means '÷', and '%' means '+', then what is the value of the expression: [75 % {(169 $ 15) # 11} @ 8]
87 D 29 A 12 B 5 C 9 = ?
If '$ means +', '# means –, '@ means ×' and '* means ÷', then what is the value of ' 16 $ 4 @ 5 # 72 * 8 ' ?
...Which sequence of mathematical symbols among given sequences must be inserted in place of the (?) in order to obtain the desired result?
(250 ? 7...
'!' means '÷', '$' means ' X ', '#' means '+' and '&' means '-' then what would be the value of the expression given below?
Expression: 63 $ ...
