Question
In the case of R vs Foster, the witness saw the
accident and a speeding truck. In this case was his statement held as admissible?Solution
The principle of res gestae is an exception to the rule that hearsay evidence is no evidence. In R vs Foster 1834, the witness did not see the accident but only the speeding truck. The deceased stated to the witness what happened to him. The statement of deceased given to the witness was admissible as evidence in res gestae.
If a sum of money is to be divided among A, B, C such that A’s share is equal to thrice B’s share and B’s share is 8 times C’s share then their ...
Amit and Bhanu put Rs. 14,400 and Rs. 19,200, respectively, into a startup. After 4 months, Chinu joined them with an investment of Rs. 10,800. If by th...
If a sum of money is to be divided among A, B, C such that A’s share is equal to twice B’s share and B’s share is 8 times C’s share then their s...
Paras and Punit started a business by investing Rs. 18,000 and Rs. 24,000 respectively. Paras also worked as the active manager and for that he is enti...
‘A’ started a business by investing Rs. 2000. Three months later, ‘B’ joined by investing Rs. ‘x’. If at the end of the year ‘B’ receive...
- X and Y opened a joint venture by investing Rs. 1200 and Rs. ‘k’ respectively. Y left the business after 6 months. If X got Rs. 5400 from the total pro...
'Pawan' and 'Qureshi' initiated a business venture with investments in the ratio of 2:3, respectively. After 8 months, 'Rita' became a partner in the bu...
The contributions made by A and B are in the ratio of 6:5. If 12% of total profit is donated and A gets 1320 as his share of profit, what is the total p...
P and Q invested in a partnership with Rs.400 and Rs.700 respectively. After 4 months Q added Rs. 'x' more. If at the end of the year profit share of P ...
Makhan Lal started a business with the capital investing Rs 18,400. After 6 months Arvind Lal invested Rs 16200. At the end of one year they made a prof...
