Question
A previous Judgment is relevant to bar a second suit or
a trial as per which rule of evidence?Solution
S. 40. Previous judgments relevant to bar a second suit or trial. –– The existence of any judgment, order or decree which by law prevents any Court from taking cognizance of a suit or holding a trial, is a relevant fact when the question is whether such Court ought to take cognizance of such suit or to hold such trial.
How is H related to M?
Answer the following question based on the direction given below:
If 'A#B' means 'A is the father of B' 'A@B' means 'A is the brother of B' 'A$...
If C + D means C is the mother of D, C – D means C is the father of D, C x D means C is the brother of D, and C ÷ D means C is the sister of D. If ...
If ‘K ? G + L * Q # N’ is true then how is N related to L?
In expression ‘G $ H & I @ J # K % L $ M & N’ who is the only daughter of I?
'A @ B' means 'A is married to B'. 'A & B' means 'A is the sister of B'. 'A % B' means 'A is the daughter of B'. 'A $ B' means 'A is the father of B'. I...
P + Q means ‘P is the brother of Q’, P - Q means ‘P is the daughter of Q’, P ÷ Q means ‘P is the husband of Q’, P × Q means ‘P is the so...
If ' Y $ I @ W, I # T % S, I % P' , then how is Y related to S?
A # B means ‘A is the brother of B’
A @ B means ‘A is the daughter of B’
A & B means ‘A is the husband of B’
A % B ...
Which of the following statement is correct?
I. P is father of B
 II. L is father-in-law of P
III. T is son of U
