Section 96 of Evidence Act Evidence as to application of language which can apply to one only of several persons. –– When the facts are such that the language used might have been meant to apply to any one, and could not have been meant to apply to more than one, of several persons or things, evidence may be given of facts which show which of those persons or things it was intended to apply to. Illustrations (a) A agrees to sell to B, for Rs. 1,000, “my white horse”. A has two white horses. Evidence may be give of facts which show which of them was meant. (b) A agrees to accompany B to Haidarabad. Evidence may be given of facts showing whether Haidarabad in the Dekkhan or Haiderabad in Sind was meant.
Prof. Reddy is eclipsed by his wife who is much lively and more intelligent than he is.
When he looked back, (A)/the professor understood that (B)/he spent most of his life to teach (C)/at the middle school (D).
The present impasse between China and India, is a flare in of a long- standing eczema that is the result of incessant border scratching.
He is (1)/ one of the less (2)/ important person (3)/ in the college(4)/ No error(5)
Read the given sentence to find out whether there are any grammatical/contextual errors in it. The errors, if any, will be in two of the phrases of the...
The counsel also (1)/ drastically reducing (2)/the tax rate on more than 200 good,(3)/ including most of the items (4)/ in the highest 28% tax bracket ...
The following sentence has been split into four segments. Identify the segment that contains a grammatical error.
They will be ready leaving for ...
Five grammatically correct and contextually meaningful sentences are given in this question. A paragraph can be formed by rearranging four of these sent...
(A) David made a gesture, spreading / (B) out his hands as if he was/ (C) showing that he had no / (D) explanation to make/ (E) No error.
I am (A)/ excited about the new (B)/project our team (C)/will be working on this month.(D)