Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Section 96 of Evidence Act Evidence as to application of language which can apply to one only of several persons. –– When the facts are such that the language used might have been meant to apply to any one, and could not have been meant to apply to more than one, of several persons or things, evidence may be given of facts which show which of those persons or things it was intended to apply to. Illustrations (a) A agrees to sell to B, for Rs. 1,000, “my white horse”. A has two white horses. Evidence may be give of facts which show which of them was meant. (b) A agrees to accompany B to Haidarabad. Evidence may be given of facts showing whether Haidarabad in the Dekkhan or Haiderabad in Sind was meant.
Any change in the name of the person indicated in the Memorandum of One Person Company as a nominee ________________________
Can the extension of the period of corporate insolvency resolution process be granted more than once as per the IBC section 12?
A promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque drawn or made in India and made payable in, or drawn upon any person resident in, India shall be deemed to...
What is a contingent interest in the context of property transfer according to the Transfer of Property Act?
Which of the following is a feature of doctrine of colorable legislation?
In a case instituted on a police report if the accused pleads guilty_______.
Which convention provides protection to prisoners of war under International Humanitarian Law?
As per Reg 7J of SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015, what is the effect of a term in an agreement or Code of Conduct that precl...
Negotiable Instrument according to Section 13 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 do not include__________.
Which of the following is considered as a rule of Fair Hearing under Administrative Law?