Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
State of Bombay v. Kathi Kalu Oghad is the landmark case which decided the scope of being a witness against oneself. An accused person cannot be said to have been compelled to be a witness against himself simply because he made a statement while in police custody, without anything more. Sheoraj v State:A record or memorandum of evidence or a statement or confession can be presumed to be genuine if it is taken in accordance with law. Also, the provisions of the Evidence Act make it clear that no person can claim the status of a witness except in relation to a proceeding before a Court. It follows that while an offence is still under investigation there is nobody who can be called "witness" and there is no statement that can be called "evidence", Fazal Sheikh v. Abdur Rahman: Wakf deed which is a private document kept in the office of the Sub-Registrar is a public document.
Which Section of Indian Evidence Act is founded on the doctrine laid down in “Pickard v Sears”?
Where debentures are issued by a company, the company shall create a debenture redemption reserve account_______________
According to Section 2(g) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 'judgment' means _______.
Section 9 of the Specific Relief Act provides that in a suit for specific performance of a contract _____________________
When is a gang rape said to have been committed?
As per section 76 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 any computer, computer system, floppies, compact disks, tape drives or any other accessories r...
As per the Contract Act what is the liability of person to whom money is paid, or thing delivered, by mistake or under coercion?
An LLP shall ensure that all official correspondences take place:
No dividend shall be declared or paid by a company for any financial year except________________
According to Section 71 of The Indian Evidence Act, 1872, if the attesting witness denies or does not recollect the execution of the document, its exec...