Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
State of Bombay v. Kathi Kalu Oghad is the landmark case which decided the scope of being a witness against oneself. An accused person cannot be said to have been compelled to be a witness against himself simply because he made a statement while in police custody, without anything more. Sheoraj v State:A record or memorandum of evidence or a statement or confession can be presumed to be genuine if it is taken in accordance with law. Also, the provisions of the Evidence Act make it clear that no person can claim the status of a witness except in relation to a proceeding before a Court. It follows that while an offence is still under investigation there is nobody who can be called "witness" and there is no statement that can be called "evidence", Fazal Sheikh v. Abdur Rahman: Wakf deed which is a private document kept in the office of the Sub-Registrar is a public document.
Which of the following is not the part of right to freedom as enshrined in the Article 19 of the Constitution of India (As amended)?
The period of limitation for filing any suit (for which no period of limitation has been provided in Schedule of the Limitation Act) shall be:
As per the LLP Act where the Tribunal makes an order under section 60 sanctioning a compromise or an arrangement in respect of a limited liability partn...
Bar to further suit to a plaintiff is expressly provided under which section of CPC?
A voluntarily burns a valuable security belonging to Z intending to cause wrongful loss to Z. A has committed
What does ‘R’ in SARFAESI stands for?
Judges in the Court of Session are appointed by:
The Board shall, ________ of the receipt of a reference from the Adjudicating Authority for the recommendation of an insolvency professional who may...
What constitutes an assault under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita?
Order made under section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, shall not remain in force for more than ________ from the making thereof.