Question
Mark the incorrect statement: The following
essential ingredients need to prove the guilt of an accused by circumstantial evidence______.Solution
All are correct laid down in Sharad Birdichand Sharda vs State of Maharashtra . Sharad Birdhichand Sharda v. State of Maharashtra case becomes the Landmark Judgement of Evidence Law which always helps in the interpretation of Circumstantial Evidence, Hearsay Evidence, Dying Declaration and Relevancy of the Evidences. SC introduced one Panchsheel Test for the Relevancy of the Evidences which will be applied in such type of cases where Direct Evidences are not available.
(5.013 – 30.04) = ? + 11.98% of 4799.98
17.06 2 + √36.08 – (4.04/2.99) × 3.02 × 4.92 = ? × 4.99
- What approximate value will come in place of the question mark (?) in the following question? (Note: You are not expected to calculate the exact value.)
What approximate value will come in place of the question mark (?) in the following question? (Note: You are not expected to calculate the exact value.)...
If tan θ + cot θ = 16, then find the value of tan2θ + cot2θ.
If the length of one side of a rhombus is 16cm then find its surface area. (use √ 3 = 1.732)
What approximate value will come in place of the question mark (?) in the following question? (Note: You are not expected to calculate the exact value.)...
The base of a prism is an equilateral triangle with a perimeter of 36 cm. If the height of the prism is 12 cm, calculate the volu...
22.11 × 7.02 – 70.12% of 209.69 + 227.21 = ?