Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
All are correct laid down in Sharad Birdichand Sharda vs State of Maharashtra . Sharad Birdhichand Sharda v. State of Maharashtra case becomes the Landmark Judgement of Evidence Law which always helps in the interpretation of Circumstantial Evidence, Hearsay Evidence, Dying Declaration and Relevancy of the Evidences. SC introduced one Panchsheel Test for the Relevancy of the Evidences which will be applied in such type of cases where Direct Evidences are not available.
Shivam invested 22000 at 12% p.a. simple interest for ‘x’ months. If at the end of ‘x’ months, he received a total amount of Rs.27500. What is t...
If the ratio of the sum invested and simple interest received after 1 year is 25:11 respectively, then find the rate of interest.
Vishal has certain sum of money with him. He invested 80% of the sum in scheme ‘X’ offering 15% p.a. simple interest for 8 years and received Rs. 39...
A sum of money is invested at a rate of 5% per annum simple interest. If the interest earned in 3 years is ₹900, what is the sum of money invested?
A certain sum of money becomes 4500 in 6 years and Rs. 5500 in 10 years at any certain rate of simple interest. Find the principal amount.
The certain sum amounts to Rs 9,982.50 in 2(1/2) years at 12% p.a., interest compounded 10-monthly. The sum (in Rs) is:
The difference between compound interest and simple interest at the same rate for Rs. 1800 for 2 years is Rs. 18. The rate of interest per annum is:
A certain amount of money, when invested at an annual compound interest rate of 'x%' compounded annually, grows to 1.5376 times its original value in 2 ...
A sum of money amounts to ₹17,600 in 2 years at 5% simple interest. What will be the amount after 5 years?