Question
According to Sales of Goods Act, 1930 which of the
following accurately describes the legal effect of a person, who has sold goods but continues to possess them or holds the documents of title, delivering or transferring the goods or documents to a third party who receives them in good faith and without notice of the previous sale?Solution
Section 30 of Sales of Goods act, 1930 According to the given statement, if a person who has sold goods continues to possess them or holds the documents of title and then delivers or transfers them to a third party, the third party who receives them in good faith and without notice of the previous sale obtains ownership rights to the goods or documents. This rule is based on the principle of good faith in commercial transactions. The third party is considered a bona fide purchaser, and their acquisition of the goods or documents is protected even if the original owner did not authorize the delivery or transfer.
Within what timeframe must the Authority operationalize a web-based online system for submitting applications for project registration under RERA?
As per provisions of CPC, the statement given by a judge is ______?
Read the following statements thoroughly:
1. Demand of bribe is a mandatory ingredient for conviction under Section 7.
2. Acceptance witho...
Adjudication of inter-state river disputes is carried out by?
The holder must allow the drawee of a bill of exchange ……….. to consider whether he will accept it or not.
Provision for award of cost is provided in which of the following Sections of Code of Civil Procedure?
What are the matters that are to be taken into consideration as per section 16 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, for fixing the fine, where a s...
Which section deals with the infringement of registered trademarks?
If a prospectus has been issued with intent to defraud the applicants for the securities of a company or any other person or for any fraudulent purpose,...
Which of the following is correct about the “guiding principles” the Supreme Court used in Minerva Mills (1980) regarding amendments?