Question
The case of Waryam Singh v. Emperor (AIR 1926 Lah 554)
is on:Solution
IPC In Waryam Singh v. Emperor AIR 1926 Lah 554, a Division Bench, acting under Section 79 of the Indian Penal Code, held that an accused who killed a man with several blows from a stick was not liable under Section 302, Section 304 or Section 304A 'ibid' because he believed in good faith at the time of the attack that the object of his assault was not a living human being but a ghost or some object other than a living human being. The Division Bench made it clear that the ground for their opinion was that 'mens rea' or an intention to do wrong or to commit an offence did not exist in the case and that the object of culpable homicide could only be a living human being. (In this case appellant's wife along with her husband were taking a bath on grave of her child believing that they would get her son back. It was a dark night and villagers mistook husband to be a ghost and killed him).
Where will the training of astronauts be conducted for Gaganyaan Mission?
Which of the following statement is correct about Khelo India Para Games, 2023?
I. The 1st edition of Khelo India Para Games 2023 is being organi...
What was the global Skytrax ranking of Delhi IGI Airport in 2024?
Which of the following awards is NOT conferred for excellence in dance?
Under which climatic conditions do the late rite soils develop?
Where are the printing presses facility of Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran Pvt. Limited is situated?Â
Which of the following is/are NOT a non-justifiable right?
1. Right to work
2. Equal pay for equal work (for men and women)
3. ...
The government of India has extended the Foreign Trade Policy from earlier September 30, 2021 to_____ now?
Which of the following won the 'NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY AWARDTRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH' in National Technology Week 2023?
What was the reason for the gathering of people at Jallianwala Bagh to protest and oppose?