Question
The case of Waryam Singh v. Emperor (AIR 1926 Lah 554)
is on:Solution
IPC In Waryam Singh v. Emperor AIR 1926 Lah 554, a Division Bench, acting under Section 79 of the Indian Penal Code, held that an accused who killed a man with several blows from a stick was not liable under Section 302, Section 304 or Section 304A 'ibid' because he believed in good faith at the time of the attack that the object of his assault was not a living human being but a ghost or some object other than a living human being. The Division Bench made it clear that the ground for their opinion was that 'mens rea' or an intention to do wrong or to commit an offence did not exist in the case and that the object of culpable homicide could only be a living human being. (In this case appellant's wife along with her husband were taking a bath on grave of her child believing that they would get her son back. It was a dark night and villagers mistook husband to be a ghost and killed him).
Who shall make a premature termination of prospecting licences or mining leases in respect of any mineral other than a minor mineral?
No attachment under a precept shall continue for more than_____
Which of the following cases upheld ‘secularism’ as a basic feature of the Indian Constitution even before the word ‘secular’ was inserted in t...
Contract for sale is for ___.
According to the IBC who shall constitute the committee of creditors?
Which of the contracts cannot be specifically enforced?
Who is the present chairman of MPEDA (Jan 2022)
Under the BNS, 2023, what is the legal status of attempt to suicide (previously IPC Section 309)?
The Authority may, by granting a certificate of registration permit one or more persons to act as a pension fund for the purpose of ____________________
Law of Limitation is based on the maxim-