What does the principle of Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat

Statements: S > P = N ≤ L, O = L > U, U ≥ W > V ≥ U = T

Conclusions:

I. N ≤ W

II. L > T

III. S > T

Statements: R > U ≤ V = W ≥ S; T < M ≤ P = S

Conclusions:

I. V ≥ M

II. P < V

III. W ≥ T

Statements: P < L = O; N = M ≤ J ≤ K; M ≤ L

Conclusions:

I. K ≥ O

II. N ≤ L

III. O ≥ N

Statements: P % Q, P $ R, Q # S, R @ T

Conclusions:

I. R $ Q                     

Statements:K < L,L ≥ M,M > N

Conclusions: I. K < M II. N > K

Statements: E & F, H # I, G $ F, E % D, G @ H

Statements:        A # B # O $ P & Q % R % Z

Statements: B > D > X > T ≤ N ≥ O = U

Conclusion

I: N > D

II: T > B

Statement: A < Z > I < B > S = O ≤ N

Conclusions:

I. S= N

II. B > O