Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
From Statement 1: Shop N earns ₹2,500 from G1, making it 30% less than Shop M’s profit on G1. Thus, Shop M’s profit on G1 is 2500 / 0.7 = ₹3,571. Without additional information about Shop M’s profit on G2, Statement 1 alone is insufficient. From Statement 2: Cost of G1 in Shop M is ₹2,000 with a 20% profit, so the profit on G1 is 2000 * 0.2 = ₹400. Since profit on G2 is double that of G1, it’s ₹400 * 2 = ₹800. Total profit = 400 + 800 = ₹1,200, and this gives a profit percentage with total sales, making Statement 2 alone sufficient. Correct Answer: (b) Statement 2 alone is sufficient, but statement 1 alone is not sufficient.
H is the son-in-law of G and is the brother-in-law of M who is the brother of K. K is the daughter of G. How is M related to G? Â
How is P related to T?
How is P related to Q?
Z is the brother of Y, W is the wife of V, who is the only son of P, who is the male member of the family. Y is the daughter of W. How is P related to Z?
How is G related to the wife of L?
A + B means B is brother of A.
A - B means A is mother of B.
A x B means A is father of B.
A ÷ B means A is son of B.
Which of the following is definitely false?
Which of the following statement is true regarding F?
If “J#K^P%R#O”, then How O is related to J?
How is M related to O?